![]() |
![]() [±¹Á¦¼Ò½Ä] HIV¸¦ Áõ¸íÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷¿¡°Ô 1õ ÆÄ¿îµåÀÇ »ó±ÝÀ» ¼ö¿©Çϱâ·Î! HIV°¡ µ¶¸³ÀûÀÎ ½Çü¶ó¸é ¡âÁ¶Á÷¹è¾ç°ú ÃÊ¿ø½ÉºÐ¸®±â¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Á¤Á¦°¡ °¡´ÉÇØ¾ß ÇÏ¸ç ¡âÀÏÁ¤ ³óµµ¿¡¼ ¹°ÁúÀÇ ÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ »çÁøÀ» ÂïÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ°í ¡â¿ªÀü»ç È¿¼ÒÇÔÀ¯ ¼¼Æ÷¿Í ¼¼Æ÷ Àü¿°¼ºÀÇ Áõ°Å µîÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ®¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. HIV °¡¼³À» ºÎÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ¿¡ÀÌÁî ¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀÌ ÆíÁýÇÏ´Â <ÄÜÆ¼´©¿ò>(continuum)Àº ÀÌ·± Áõ°Å¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â ¿¬±¸ÀÚ¿¡°Ô 1õÆÄ¿îµåÀÇ »ó±ÝÀ» ÁÖ°Ú´Ù°í ¼±¾ðÇßÁö¸¸ ¾ÆÁ÷±îÁö »ó±ÝÀº ±×´ë·Î Àû¸³µÅ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿ø¹®À» º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷Àº Ŭ¸¯ÇϽÿÀ. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/award.htm MISSING VIRUS! ¡Ì 1000 Reward Blind romantics still believe HIV causes AIDS. But if 'HIV' has never been isolated, what is AIDS? Never isolated? You bet! A cash prize of ¡Ì 1000 is offered to the first person finding one scien- tific paper establishing actual isolation of HIV. If you or a friendly 'AIDS expert' can prove isolation, ¡Ì 1000 is yours. In cash. In public. Interested? Pledge the money to your favourite AIDS charity, why not? We bet you'll be surprised to discover the truth. c o n t i n u u m CHANGING THE WAY WE THINK ABOUT AIDS The Rules of Isolation The rules for isolation of a retrovirus were thoroughly discussed at the Pasteur Institute, Paris, in 1973, and are the logical minimum requirements for establishing the independent existence of HIV. They are: 1.Culture of putatively infected tissue. 2. Purification of specimens by density gradient ultracentrifugation. 3. Electron micrographs of particles exhibiting the morfological characteristics and dimensions (100-120nm) of retroviral particles at the sucrose (or percoll) density of 1.16 gm/ml and containing nothing else, not even particles of other morphologies or dimensions. 4. Proof that the particles contain reverse transcriptase. 5. Analysis of the particles' proteins and RNA and proof that these are unique. 6. Proof that 1-5 are a property only of putatively infected tissues and can not be induced in control cultures. These are identical cultures, that is, tissues obtained from matched, unhealthy subjects and cultured under identical conditions differing only in that they are not putatively infected with a retrovirus. 7. Proof that the particles are infectious, that is when PURE particles are introduced into an uninfected culture or animal, the identical particle is obtained as shown by repeating steps 1-5. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |